The Narco News Bulletin |
August 15, 2018 | Issue #57 |
narconews.com - Reporting on the Drug War and Democracy from Latin America |
|
The sides have lined up for the confrontation over the Fortuna-Cuzcatlan mine in San Jose del Progreso, Oaxaca. The governor of the state, and the Canadian Fortuna mining company try to avoid looking like bad guys; the teachers, the church and social activists present themselves as the good guys. The bad guys support "development" and "progress" as good goals; the good guys support environmental protection, indigenous rights, and the peoples' culture.
The church claims the state has violated the people's right to land, territory and natural resources; the right to information; the right to be consulted; the right to participate; the right to physical safety; the right to direct development; and the right to organize and protest.
The Fortuna consortium has called on the federal government to protect their lease. Fortuna controls concessions covering 50,000 hectares. The San José land package contains vast areas of unexplored but promising ground. A 2007 resource estimate (according to Fortuna's annual report) indicated 12.4 million ounces of silver and 103,500 ounces of gold are present, and inferred 32.7 million ounces of silver and 321,500 ounces of gold in addition. A twenty-year lease was granted by the government to Cuzcatlán, for an undisclosed amount of money, to operate the San José mine. Fortuna Silver is the larger partner with Continuum (gold), while Cuzcatlan is the local company in whose name the transnationals operate.
Meanwhile the National Education Workers Union (SNTE, in its Spanish initials) Section 22 demanded the immediate release of the prisoners. The secretary of Section 22, Gabriel Lopez Chinas, declared that the demands by the people of San Jose del Progreso and Magdalena Ocotlán to close the mine are legitimate.
While Lopez China insists that the demands of the people are legitimate because "they are thinking of the future, they are people who with a lot of dignity are defending their lands", the Church published eight demands for guarantees and protections of the people, including that the government stop criminalizing resistance to the mine, and give prompt justice to the detained. The Church issued a demand to the federal Secretary of the Economy to suspend the concession, since no environmental studies were done -this contradicts what the mining companies claim- nor were the peoples, whose lands are supposedly protected by international agreements regarding indigenous rights, ever consulted.
The wife of Rios Cruz condemns President Calderon and Governor Ruiz, and holds them responsible for actions against her husband, herself and her family. She calls for support from the APPO, freedom for the political prisoners, and cancellation of the arrest warrants against Augustín Ríos Cruz, Apolinar García Vásquez and Jaquelina López Almazán. This latter in fact has been absent since 2006 because of the persecution she was then subjected to, hence could not have been implicated in blocking the mine. The government frequently lodges criminal complaints against people who were not present or not involved, as a political reprisal.
However, the government went so far as to summon notary publics to witness that no excessive force was used to break the blockade. The civil organizations have roundly contradicted that assertion.
Two priests have been threatened. Father Martín Octavio Garcia Ortiz, the priest of the parish of San Pedro Apóstol, Ocotlán, Oaxaca, was denounced by the mine supporters. The coordinator of the Diocese Commission for Justice and Peace, Father Wilfrido Mayrén Peláez, was threatened physically.
A person observing the convoluted struggles in Oaxaca for power with money on one hand, and power with dignity on the other, might believe that neoliberalism is alive and determined; liberation theology has made a comeback; the Section 22 teachers union now represents the militant non-violent left in Oaxaca; and that the people united will never be defeated.